Anti-vaccine wingnut John Stone
Oh look - famed vaccine wingnut John Stone has finally admitted his paid up membership of the Fucking Loony Party.
This link is possibly the nuttiest thing he's posted - and that's saying something.
Of course, we ought not forget where the Aids epidemic started.
John Stone (who, in case you'd forgotten, is a cock) has linked to a mental "Vaccines Caused AIDS" video on YouTube entitled "Dr. Maurice Hilleman, explains why Merck's vaccines have spread AIDS & other plagues worldwide". It's here. It's also fucking nuts.
In a supposed interview with Dr Maurice Hilleman, it bangs on about the SV40 "monkey virus" - which has never been demonstrated to have any ill effects in humans - in polio vaccine, and then goes on to suppose that AIDS has been spread by vaccines - despite "Hilleman" never suggesting anything of the sort.
Watch the video - then marvel that John "Cock" Stone thinks that this represents evidence that AIDS was spread by vaccines. The man's a fucking loon.
The Court found, supra, that Bailey’s ADEM was both caused-in-fact and proximately caused
ReplyDeleteby his vaccination. It is well-understood that the vaccination at issue can cause ADEM, and the
Court found, based upon a full reading and hearing of ...the pertinent facts in this case, that it
did actually cause the ADEM. Furthermore, Bailey’s ADEM was severe enough to cause lasting,
residual damage, and retarded his developmental progress, which fits under the generalized heading
of Pervasive Developmental Delay, or PDD. The Court found that Bailey would not have suffered
this delay but for the administration of the MMR vaccine, and that this chain of causation was not
too remote, but was rather a proximate sequence of cause and effect leading inexorably from
vaccination to Pervasive Developmental Delay.
Based upon that finding of fact, it follows as a natural conclusion that Petitioner has carried
his burden of proving to a preponderance that the MMR vaccine at issue actually caused the
condition(s) from which Bailey suffered and continues to suffer. Inasmuch as the other elements of
§ 300aa–11 (b) and (c) have already been satisfied, the Court holds that Petitioner has met his burden
on his case in chief.
These facts likewise satisfy the Althen test set forth above. Petitioner’s theory of PDD
caused by vaccine-related ADEM causally connects the vaccination and the ultimate injury, and does
so by explaining a logical sequence of cause and effect showing that the vaccination was the ultimate
reason for the injury. Also, the timetable in this case for the onset of ADEM fits within the range
found to be reasonable in the cases addressing the same question. See Lodge v. Secretary of HHS,
No. 92-0697V, 1994 WL 34609, 1994 US Claims LEXIS 19, 31 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 25, 1994),
Tufo v. Secretary of HHS, No. 98-0108V, 2001 WL 286911, 2001 US Claims LEXIS 46, 33-34
(Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Mar. 2, 2001), and Saunders v. Secretary of HHS, No. 97-0808V, 2001 WL
1135035, 2001 U.S. Claims LEXIS 225, 9 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sep. 4, 2001).
In contrast, the Court found, as a matter of fact, that Bailey did not suffer from glucose
transporter deficiency, or any other factor unrelated to vaccination.