"Advice3" has made some comment,
The position often stated in this forum is that the decline of measles etc was due to better sanitation and hygiene, and not vaccination.This is true. The JABS position has always been that measles deaths have been on the decline, and so measles would have died out without vaccination. The truth is somewhat different, as I outlined in my last post.
Minority View now agrees with me.
You dudes really cannot get things straight, can you?
Decline in measles, no. Decline in measles deaths, yes.
Just look at the rate of measles deaths in U.S. in 50s and compare to rate of measles deaths in Africa. Were all the children vaxed against measles in the U.S. in 1950? No. Did they die by the 100s of thousands? No.
But this may be too subtle a concept.
What may be too subtle a concept for you, is what's mind-fuckingly obvious to the rest of us;
If death from measles has dropped to such a low level - say, one in 10,000 - then if thanks to vaccination the actual number of children infected is in single, or the low double figures, then the number of deaths will be zero. Or maybe one in ten years.
If, however, you don't vaccinate, and every child gets measles, at that such low level, we'll have ten, twenty, thirty, a hundred deaths a year. And that's deaths. Kids are left permanently disabled due to measles and mumps. Yes, they may well be kids with reduced immune function - but if you vaccinated all the kids around them, they wouldn't be exposed to measles in the first place. YOU MORON! But you don't actually care, do you? You, Stone, Fletcher - you don't care about real children, dead children, do you? No. You care about proving your vile pseudo-science point. You've been shown to be wrong again and again - but you can't let it lie. And children will die because of you. You evil witch.
Now - how difficult is that?
Minority View, and all those who support her witterings, WANT CHILDREN TO DIE.
Anti-vaccinators should be retitled as "advocates of lethal diseases".